Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach for Severe Acute Cholecystitis – Integrative Review

Authors

  • Moara Carvalhaes de Almeida Borges Silva Centro Universitário de Valença - UNIFAA
  • Maria Isabel Marques Melo de Oliveira Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE
  • Larissa Avila Branco Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG
  • Gabriella Rodrigues de Oliveira Andrade Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora - UFJF
  • Julia Cavalcanti Brito Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco - UNIVASF
  • Gabriela Cristina Lobato Universidade Nove de Julho
  • Joaquim Ferreira de Paula Centro Universitário de valença - UNIFAA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24859/SaberDigital.2025v18n2.1710

Keywords:

Acute Cholecystitis, Surgical Treatment, Minimally Invasive Procedures, Cholecystectomy

Abstract

Introduction: Inflammation of the gallbladder is called cholecystitis, which can occur in acute or chronic forms, primarily affecting the elderly and patients with dyslipidemia. In its severe form, it can cause intense pain and lead to complications such as gallbladder perforation and sepsis. Objective: To review minimally invasive surgical practices in the management of severe acute cholecystitis (SAC), assessing their efficacy and clinical implications. Methodology: Integrative review based on searches in PubMed and BVS databases, including studies from 2004 to 2024, in Portuguese and English. Ten articles were selected after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results and Discussion: Percutaneous cholecystostomy was effective in relieving symptoms in critically ill patients, reducing complications and hospital stay duration. Strategies to minimize conversion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy proved effective in reducing conversion rates to open surgery. The minilaparotomy technique demonstrated lower costs and a good success rate, whereas laparoscopy showed a higher risk of biliary injuries. Robotic cholecystectomy offers potential benefits but lacks robust evidence. Conclusion: Minimally invasive approaches, such as percutaneous cholecystostomy and improvements in laparoscopy, are promising alternatives for SAC, especially in high-risk patients. Future research should further explore the role of robotic surgery.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALVINO, D. M. L. et al. Long-term outcomes following percutaneous cholecystostomy tube placement for treatment of acute calculous cholecystitis. J Gastrointest Surg, v. 21, n. 5, p. 761–769, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3375-4

BHATTACHARYA, D.; AMMORI, B. J. Contemporary minimally invasive approaches to the management of acute cholecystitis: a review and appraisal. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, v. 15, n. 1, p. 1–8, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sle.0000153730.24862.0a

BORZELLINO, G. et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for severe acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of results. Surgical Endoscopy, v. 22, n. 1, p. 8–15, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9511-6

BYUN, G. Y.; LEE, S. R.; KOO, B. H. Safety of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. ANZ J Surg, v. 88, n. 7–8, p. 755–759, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.14246

CHERNG, N. et al. Use of cholecystostomy tubes in the management of patients with primary diagnosis of acute cholecystitis. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, v. 214, n. 2, p. 196–201, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.11.005

CHOU, C. K. et al. Early percutaneous cholecystostomy in severe acute cholecystitis reduces the complication rate and duration of hospital stay. Medicine (Baltimore), v. 94, n. 27, p. e1096, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001096

GIGER, U. et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: indication, technique, risk and outcome. Langenbeck’s Archives of Surgery, v. 390, n. 5, p. 373–380, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-004-0509-4

GRINIATSOS, J. et al. Percutaneous cholecystostomy without interval cholecystectomy as definitive treatment of acute cholecystitis in elderly and critically ill patients. South Med J, v. 101, n. 6, p. 586–590, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SMJ.0b013e3181757b77

HERMÓGENES, T. C. S. et al. Colecistite aguda: uma revisão abrangente sobre a epidemiologia, fisiopatologia, manifestações clínicas, diagnóstico, classificação, tratamento, prognóstico e complicações. Brazilian Journal of Health Review, v. 6, n. 5, p. 20288–20303, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34119/bjhrv6n5-074

KALLINI, J. et al. Comparing clinical outcomes of image-guided percutaneous transperitoneal and transhepatic cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis. Acta Radiologica, v. 62, n. 9, p. 1142–1147, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185120959829

KEUS, F.; BROEDERS, I. A. M. J.; VAN LAARHOVEN, C. J. H. M. Surgical aspects of symptomatic cholecystolithiasis and acute cholecystitis. Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology, v. 20, n. 6, p. 1031–1051, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2006.05.008

LEBIGOT, J. et al. Percutaneous cholecystostomy in non-surgical patients. Journal de Radiologie, v. 81, n. 11, 2000.

LOW, S.-W. et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: safe implementation of successful strategies to reduce conversion rates. Surgical Endoscopy, v. 23, n. 11, p. 2424–2429, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0374-x

MCMAHON, A. et al. Laparoscopic and minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a randomized trial comparing postoperative pain and pulmonary function. Surgery, v. 115, n. 5, 1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00132586-199412000-00023

REINISCH, A. et al. Robotic operations in urgent general surgery: a systematic review. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-022-01425-6

RONCHI, L. et al. Avanços e desafios em cirurgia geral minimamente invasiva: uma revisão de literatura. Brazilian Journal of Health Review, v. 6, n. 4, p. 16615–16632, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34119/bjhrv6n4-203

ROSIEK, A.; LEKSOWSKI, K. Technology advances in hospital practices. Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment, v. 14, n. 3, p. 270–276, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1533034614546974

SHULUTKO, A. M.; KAZARYAN, A. M.; AGADZHANOV, V. G. Mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: technique, outcomes: a prospective study. International Journal of Surgery, v. 5, n. 6, p. 423–428, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2007.07.004

VAUTHEY, J. N. et al. Indications and limitations of percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis. Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics, v. 176, n. 1, 1993.

VARGAS, E. J. C. et al. Manejo da colecistite aguda: uma revisão narrativa. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, v. 6, n. 6, p. 1648–1661, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n6p1648-1661

Published

2025-05-12

How to Cite

Carvalhaes de Almeida Borges Silva, M., Marques Melo de Oliveira , M. I., Avila Branco, L., Rodrigues de Oliveira Andrade, G., Cavalcanti Brito, J., Cristina Lobato, G., & Ferreira de Paula, J. (2025). Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach for Severe Acute Cholecystitis – Integrative Review. Revista Saber Digital, 18(2), e20251806. https://doi.org/10.24859/SaberDigital.2025v18n2.1710

Issue

Section

Medicine